
Summary: In Array BioPharma Inc. v Deputy Controller of Patents, the Delhi High Court set aside the Controller’s refusal of Array BioPharma’s combination patent application and remanded it for fresh consideration. The Court held that the Controller had wrongly applied Section 3(d) to a combination of independent active agents, and incorrectly treated a product claim as a method-of-treatment claim. The ruling reinforces that combination patent claims must be assessed on proper inventive-step reasoning tied to the closest prior art and that Section 3(d) does not bar combinations of distinct, independently active pharmaceutical (or agrochemical) agents, giving innovators a stronger footing in defending multi-component combination inventions in India.
Continue Reading Significant Ruling on Combination Patents: Delhi High Court Highlights Inventive Step and Patentability Criteria








