Listen to this post
Enabling Differential Distribution for Alternative Investment Funds in IFSC

Summary: The International Financial Services Centres Authority (“IFSCA”) has proposed a new regulatory framework allowing Alternative Investment Funds (“AIFs”) in GIFT IFSC to create multiple unit classes with differential return profiles. The proposal facilitates AIFs with enhanced flexibility to raise capital from investors with varying risk appetites while also enabling blended finance structures that combine commercial, concessional, and philanthropic capital for sustainable investments. IFSCA’s proposed approach offers notably greater flexibility compared to SEBI’s domestic regulations, thereby enabling broader investor participation while maintaining robust investor protection measures.

Continue Reading Enabling Differential Distribution for Alternative Investment Funds in IFSC
Listen to this post
Whose Privilege is it anyway?: A critique of the recent Supreme Court Judgment on Attorney-Client Privilege

Summary: In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has reinforced the constitutional and statutory foundation of attorney-client privilege. The article offers a deeper dive into the judgment’s implications and its potential impact on legal practice in India.

Continue Reading Whose Privilege is it anyway? A critique of the recent Supreme Court Judgment on Attorney-Client Privilege
Listen to this post

Summary: Companies undertaking a reverse flip with an eye on an India IPO may need to navigate a complex web of potentially time-sensitive legal and regulatory issues, which may impact the company’s legal, financial, and compliance frameworks and give founders, investors, and the management lots to consider. If not planned carefully, issues may become bottlenecks or roadblocks during the IPO process. Companies should anticipate Indian regulatory expectations to align moving parts well in advance for a successful and timely IPO.

Continue Reading The Road Home Leads to Dalal Street: Key considerations for IPOs after “reverse flips”
Listen to this post
FIG Paper (No. 52): RBI Directions on Lending Against Gold and Silver Collateral: A Harmonised Regulatory Framework

Summary: The Reserve Bank of India (Lending Against Gold and Silver Collateral) Directions, 2025, notified on June 6, 2025, establishes a unified regulatory framework for lending against gold and silver collateral by all regulated entities and prescribes a deadline of April 1, 2026, for implementation. These directions provide a single principle-based regulation, addressing systemic issues in the gold loan sector whilst introducing enhanced customer protection measures, standardised assaying protocols, and transparent collateral management processes to create a more robust and customer-centric ecosystem. As regulated entities gear up to adopt the necessary changes by the prescribed deadline, this paper summarises the key changes and compliances laid down by the directions while specifying the important aspects that lenders need to focus on.

Continue Reading FIG Paper (No. 52): RBI Directions on Lending Against Gold and Silver Collateral: A Harmonised Regulatory Framework
Listen to this post
FIG Paper No. [51] (VDA Series 7): Stablecoins: Recent Indian and Global Regulatory Trends

Introduction

The global stablecoin market capitalisation has crossed USD 230 billion in 2025, representing a growth trajectory that can position stablecoins as critical financial instruments that enterprises can leverage in emerging digital payment corridors and enhance operational competitiveness in global markets.

Continue Reading FIG Paper No. 51 (VDA Series 7): Stablecoins: Recent Indian and Global Regulatory Trends
Listen to this post
The Draft AI Rules: A Welcome First Step

Summary: In a move to regulate deepfake, fake news and other misinformation, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has proposed draft rules seeking to amend the existing intermediary guidelines. They propose a wide definition of “synthetically generated information” without meaningful and practical standards on authenticity thresholds. Combined with this, it provides for prescriptive labelling norms that may leave little to no flexibility for intermediaries and additionally seeks to impose onerous user verification related obligations for significant social media intermediaries without any brightline standards. While the objective of the proposed regulations, rooted in user safety, is laudable, the draft in its current form can have wide reaching implications on how the overall AI ecosystem develops in India. As the devil lies in the details, it would be prudent to revisit the proposed rules and account for practical considerations, thresholds, and standards that will contribute to effective implementation. The draft rules are open for stakeholder consultation until November 6, 2025, and offer an opportunity to engage with the government for shaping the balance between innovation and user safety.

Continue Reading The Draft AI Rules: A Welcome First Step
Listen to this post

Summary: This blog post provides an overview of the Maharashtra’s new Global Capability Centre Policy, approved in September 2025, which aims to position the state as India’s premier innovation hub by attracting 400 new GCCs. This policy is important because it transforms Maharashtra into a strategic competitor to traditional GCC hubs like Bangalore and Hyderabad, offering businesses substantial benefits including capital subsidies, tax exemptions, dedicated infrastructure, and access to a skilled talent pool, whilst supporting India’s broader vision.  

Continue Reading Maharashtra Pushes Toward Claiming a Bigger Piece of the GCC Pie: MH GCC Policy 2025
Listen to this post

Summary:

In continuation to Part I of the III part IFSC Education series available at Shaping Global Education: Foreign Universities in GIFT IFSC, this article focusses on certain frequently asked questions in the education sector, with the objective of bringing clarity to prospective universities intending to establish International Branch Campuses (“IBC”) in GIFT International Financial Services Centre (“GIFT IFSC”) either on a standalone basis or through an Academic Infrastructure Services Provider (“AISP”) model. These FAQs also explain how a Foreign Educational Institution can establish an Offshore Educational Centre (“OEC”) in GIFT IFSC, under the International Financial Services Centres Authority (Setting up and Operation of International Branch Campuses and Offshore Education Centres) Regulations, 2022 (“IBC and OEC Regulations”).

What is an IBC?

    IBC means a campus set up as a branch by a foreign university on a standalone basis, or in such other form as may be permitted by the International Financial Services Centres Authority (“IFSCA”) in GIFT IFSC for the purposes of delivering courses, including research programmes in permissible subject areas, that are duly accredited under the relevant framework in their respective home jurisdiction. These are registered with the IFSCA.

    What is an OEC?

    OEC means a centre set up as a branch by a foreign educational institution (other than a foreign university) in GIFT IFSC on a standalone basis or in such other form as may be permitted by the IFSCA.

    What is QS World Universities Ranking?

    “QS world university ranking” refers to the annual publication of university rankings by QS Quacquarelli Symonds Ltd. For the purpose of these regulations, only the University’s global overall ranking “and / or the subject rankings” is required to be considered as specified in regulation 3(1)(viii) of the IBC and OEC Regulations.

    What happens if the applicant is not able to set up campus within the 180 days as stated in the in-principle approval?

    If the applicant is not able to set up required infrastructure within 180 days, it is required to make an application for extension of time to the IFSCA chairperson, 7 days before the expiry if such 180 days period. Subject to the request, the IFSCA chairperson may extend the period for not more than 90 days. An extension of the in-principle approval beyond that 270 days limit must require approval from the board of IFSCA.

    Can the IBC or OEC set up on a for profit basis?

    The IBC or OEC is expected to set up on a ‘for profit basis’, to enable capital transmission from home jurisdiction to the IBC or OEC set up in GIFT City.

    Is the IBC/ OEC required to comply with Indian domestic laws enacted by Indian regulators in the higher education sector, such as the University Grants Commission, All India Council for Technical Education that govern different streams of academic programmes offered?

    No, as per notification dated May 24, 2023, the University Grants Commission Act, 1956, and the All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987, will not apply to campuses established in GIFT IFSC.  

    Do IBC/ OEC have minimum capital infusion or minimum capitalisation requirement?

    No, the IBC and OEC Regulations, do not provide for any minimum capital infusion or minimum capitalisation requirements.

    Do IBC/ OEC have a minimum space requirement?

    No, the IBC and OEC Regulations do not provide for any minimum space requirements.

    Can revenue be freely repatriated to the home country without any foreign exchange control restrictions?

    Yes, IBC and OEC Regulations specially permits for the revenue earned by the IBC or OEC in GIFT IFSC to be freely repatriated to the home country..

    Can the course, curriculum or content be modified to cater to GIFT IFSC requirements?

      The IBC and OEC Regulations permit modifying the course curriculum or content with prior approval of the IFSCA and Parent Entity’s academic council, syndicate or any other competent body.

      Can a Parent Entity have a representative office as an IBC or OEC?

        No, an IBC or OEC cannot act as a representative office for the Parent Entity for undertaking promotional activities for their programmes in home and other jurisdiction.

        What are the permissible currencies in which IBC and OEC can transact?

          The IBC or OEC can undertake all transactions in any of the following currencies, which is required to be elected in its application to IFSCA:

          • US Dollar,
          • Euro (EUR),
          • Japanese Yen,
          • UK Pound Sterling,
          • Canadian Dollar,
          • Australian Dollar,
          • Swiss Franc,
          • Hong Kong Dollar,
          • Singapore Dollar,
          • UAE Dirham,
          • Russian Rouble,
          • Swedish Krone,
          • Norwegian Krone,
          • New Zealand Dollar,
          • Danish Krone.

          However, administrative expenses and certain business expenses may be defrayed in INR, through a separate special non-resident rupee account (SNRR Account) opened by the IBC with the authorised dealer bank in India basis the IFSCA’s January 29, 2025, circular.

          Can IBC or OEC withdraw or discontinue a course or programme?

            Yes, the IBC or OEC can withdraw or discontinue a course or programme, for any reason, with prior written IFSCA approval. However, the Parent Entity must provide an alternative to the affected students (transition plan), and this may or may not include reallocation of the course or programme conducted by it.

            Since Foreign Universities in IFSC form a part of “Financial Services”, are they required to comply with IFSCA (Anti Money Laundering, Counter-Terrorist Financing and Know Your Customer) Guidelines, 2022?

              IFSCA through circular dated November 18, 2024, has exempted IBC/ OEC from the applicability of IFSCA (Anti Money Laundering, Counter-Terrorist Financing and Know Your Customer) Guidelines, 2022.

              What is AISP?

                An AISP is a service provider providing services to IBC/ OEC. These may include providing any one or more of the built up campus facilities, research and development facility, library, laboratories, incubation centres, teaching classrooms, and incidental support services such as campus facility management services, student onboarding, admissions and student welfare services, services for recruitment and management of non-academic staff, branding and marketing, payroll, and any other service directly or indirectly supporting or assisting the delivery of courses by IBC and OEC in IFSC as provided under the IFSCA AISP Circular dated December 14, 2023.

                Is an AISP an IFSCA regulated entity?

                  No, an AISP is not IFSCA regulated, but is regulated by the provisions of the SEZ Act, 2005, and the applicable rules and regulations.

                  Is AISP eligible for IFSC income tax holiday under Section 80LA of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

                    No, an AISP is not eligible for income tax holiday under Section 80LA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

                    What are the eligibility criteria for an AISP?

                    1. AISP should be incorporated as a separate company in GIFT SEZ;
                    2. AISP should have a minimum net worth of USD 1 million or equivalent for providing academic infrastructure services and it must be maintained at all times while providing services to IBC/ OEC; and
                    3. An AISP or any of its group companies must have at least three years of prior experience of providing similar services to recognised universities/ educational institutions in India or overseas.

                    Are there any obligations on IBC or OEC for availing AISP services?

                    An IBC or OEC is not obligated to use the services of an AISP, but if it does engage with an AISP, then it must:

                    • Enter into a formal written agreement with the AISP, covering at the least the provisions required under the AISP Circular.
                    • Provide a copy of the AISP agreement to the IFSCA immediately upon execution and must notify the IFSCA of any modifications or terminations prior to the agreement’s expiry date.
                    • Provide written confirmation to the IFSCA that no academic functions are being outsourced to the AISP, either directly or indirectly.

                    Conclusion:

                    This article provides clarity on the regulatory framework under the IBC and OEC Regulations and will help foreign universities and educational institutions intending to establish IBCs or OECs in GIFT IFSC. GIFT IFSC presents a compelling opportunity for foreign universities seeking to expand their presence in India, offering the ability to operate on a for-profit basis with free repatriation of profits, exemption from Indian domestic higher education laws, freedom to transact in multiple currencies, and no minimum capital infusion or space requirements. Degrees, diplomas, and certificates issued by IBCs or OECs enjoy the same recognition and status as if they were issued by the parent entity in their home jurisdiction, ensuring academic credibility for students.

                    The IFSC represents one of India’s most progressive regulatory environments, with the IFSCA committed to transforming IFSC into a leading education hub.

                    (Please note that the FAQs are intended to be provided just for the information of foreign universities looking to set up in GIFT IFSC and does not constitute legal advice. Basis amendments and circulars, the FAQs are subject to further updation.)

                    Listen to this post
                    Turning Up The Heat: India’s First National Geothermal Energy Policy Unveiled

                    Summary: This article introduces India’s first national geothermal energy policy, marking a strategic leap in diversifying renewable energy sources. The policy adds immense value by unlocking geothermal’s potential for power, heating, cooling, and industrial use, with support from global standards, fiscal incentives, and oil-gas sector synergies.

                    Continue Reading Turning Up The Heat: India’s First National Geothermal Energy Policy Unveiled