Summary: This blog examines the concept of “deemed public company” and recommends changes in the legal architecture to deal with large private companies with significant exposure to public funds.Continue Reading Reimagining the Regulatory Architecture for Deemed Public Companies
Summary: This blog examines the legal position regarding legal privilege under Evidence law and discusses instances where enforcement agencies have summoned lawyers, along with the recent observations of the Supreme Court on the subject.Continue Reading Investigating Agencies’ Overreach in Summoning Lawyers: SC Intervenes
The enactment of the SEBI Act in 1992 (“SEBI Act”), followed by the amendment of Section 21 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (“SCRA”), empowered the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) to regulate the process of listing of securities by public companies.Continue Reading Ten Years of LODR: The Journey from “Minimum Principles” to “Maximum Prescriptions”
The Companies Act, 2013 (“CA 2013”) defines a director as a person who has been appointed to the Board of a company[1]. Directors typically have various duties and obligations towards the company, shareholders and all other stakeholders. They are also subject to civil and criminal liability under CA 2013, as well as under various other statutes, which have a standard vicarious liability clause for directors and officers of the company. In this context, another concept that emerges is of a “shadow director” or a “deemed director” who is a person not officially appointed to the Board but on whose instructions and directions the Board is accustomed to act upon. In this blog, we analyse the legal position surrounding “shadow directors” in India and the United Kingdom (“UK”).Continue Reading Unseen Influence of Shadow Directors: Does it compromise corporate governance?
India’s evolving financial reporting system has made robust corporate governance mechanisms indispensable. The need for heightened financial reporting mechanisms was first felt after the country was rocked by multiple corporate scandals, specifically 2009’s Satyam Computer scam. The scam exposed numerous auditing-related issues, namely, the manipulative practices of auditors, inadequacy of regulatory oversight in accounting and auditing standards, and the importance of accountability of the professional conduct of auditors. It also raised crucial questions related to the independence and effectiveness of auditors. Against this backdrop, there was a reverberating demand for stronger institutional frameworks to regulate and supervise accounting and auditing standards in the country. It became imperative to set up an autonomous body for financial reporting to attract foreign investment and elevate public confidence in the financials of investee companies, leading to the establishment of the National Financial Reporting Authority (“NFRA”).Continue Reading The Doctrine of Vicarious Liability of Auditors: Delhi HC Judgment in Deloitte v. Union of India