Summary: SEBI has introduced new Amendment Regulations and a CIV Circular allowing Category I and II AIFs to offer co-investment opportunities through Co-investment Schemes (CIV schemes). This provides an alternative to the existing Co-investment Portfolio Manager route under PMS Regulations. The new framework addresses limitations like additional registration costs and investor profile concerns. Key features
Summary: In a decisive move to recalibrate institutional investments and fortify the financial ecosystem, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has released the RBI (Investment in AIF) Directions, 2025. These comprehensive guidelines overhaul the existing framework governing how regulated entities (REs) such as banks, NBFCs, and other financial institutions allocate capital to Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs). With stricter exposure caps, mandatory provisioning requirements, and sharper focus on investment-linked risk, the Directions signal a more cautious regulatory stance—aimed at mitigating systemic vulnerabilities and curbing potential misuse of AIF structures. This blog unpacks the key provisions, their far-reaching implications, and the strategic shifts mandated for REs.Continue Reading RBI notifies restrictions on investments by regulated entities in AIFs’
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), vide its settlement order dated May 06, 2025 (“Order”), has accepted a settlement application filed by the investment manager (“Manager”) of a real estate fund (“Fund”), sponsored by a related sponsor entity (“Sponsor”), for breach of various provisions of the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 (“AIF Regulations”)[1], and the SEBI Master Circular for Alternative Investment Funds, dated May 7, 2024 (“Master Circular”)[2], subject to a payment of INR 36 lakh by the Manager on behalf of itself and the Fund. The Settlement Order emanated from a suo-moto application, seeking settlement of issues pertaining to conflict of interest and non-compliances in operations of the Fund.Continue Reading SEBI Order casts Spotlight on Conflicts of Interest of AIFs
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), as part of its ongoing regulatory reforms, released a consultation paper on February 7, 2025, seeking public comments to review Regulation 17(a) of the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 (“AIF Regulations”). The objective is to enhance investment flexibility for Alternative Investment Funds (“AIFs”), particularly in debt securities, while addressing concerns arising from recent regulatory changes by way of allowing Category II AIFs to make up to 100% of their investment in certain listed debt securities as explained in detail below. As of now, Category II AIFs are allowed to make less than 50% of their investments in listed securities.Continue Reading SEBI Proposes to Unlock Listed Debt Markets for Category II AIFs
A new set of regulations has been implemented for Alternative Investment Funds (“AIFs”) to exercise “specific due diligence”,[1] with respect to their investors. The aim is to prevent investors from circumventing the extant norms administered by the financial sector regulators. These include:Continue Reading SEBI Prescribes Due Diligence Norms for AIFs to Curb Regulatory Circumvention
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) vide its circular dated February 05, 2020, had introduced certain disclosure standards by way of a private placement memorandum (“PPM”) template that all SEBI registered Alternative Investment Funds (“AIFs”) were expected to adhere to. The PPM template inter-alia provided for disclosures under the term “Excuse and Exclusion” and “Direct Plan for investors and constituents of fees that may be charged by the AIFs”.Despite the PPM template, SEBI observed certain disclosure-related inconsistencies and lack of transparency. SEBI by way of circulars dated April 10, 2023, updated the regulatory framework by way of new guidelines to bring in consistency related to disclosures in the PPM.Continue Reading SEBI Codifies Norms for Excuse and Exclusion and Direct Plan for Investors
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) released five consultation papers on proposed changes in regulatory norms for alternative investment funds (“AIFs”), inviting comments from the public, on February 03, 2023. These consultation papers indicate the next generation of regulatory reforms that SEBI has planned for AIFs.Continue Reading SEBI Unveils Next Generation Reforms for AIFs
The rise of domestic capital in alternative asset space requires the AIF Regulatory Platform be made available to In-house Funds
The Indian growth story has been propelled by alternative asset classes that witnessed an unprecedented inflow of domestic and foreign capital in the last few years. Alternative Investment Funds (“AIFs”) have played an essential role in this and have raised, as on June 30, 2022[1], a whopping INR 6,94,520 crore (Indian Rupees Six lakh ninety-four thousand and five hundred twenty crore), of which actual deployed capital stands at INR 3,11,343 crore (Indian Rupees Three lakh eleven thousand and three hundred forty-three crore). These numbers are up from INR 2,90,339 crore (Indian Rupees Two lakh ninety thousand and three hundred thirty-nine crore) of capital raised and INR 1,19,758 crore (Indian Rupees One lakh nineteen thousand and seven hundred fifty-eight crore) of actual capital deployed, as on June 30, 2019[2]. Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), being the capital market regulator in India, has played an active role in streamlining the AIF industry. SEBI’s proactive and investor-friendly approach is often reflected in the discourses with market participants as well as in the guidelines / circulars / regulations issued for the AIF industry.Continue Reading An Argument for In-house Alternative Investment Funds
Previously, RBI had permitted Indian entities to make mandatory sponsor commitment to AIFs in IFSC under the ‘automatic route’
Alternative Investment Funds (“AIFs”) set up in an International Financial Services Centre (“IFSC”) are required to register themselves as Foreign Portfolio Investors (“FPIs”), for being able to invest inter alia in securities listed on Indian stock exchanges or in specific listed or unlisted corporate debt securities of Indian companies. Since entities set up in IFSCs are equivalent to ‘non-residents’ for the purposes of Indian foreign exchange regulations, restrictions placed by Securities Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) and the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) on participation of Indian residents in FPIs are, by default, applicable to AIFs in IFSC. Considering that AIFs may be set up by managers/ sponsors who are resident Indian entities and that the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 (“AIF Regulations”), require managers/ sponsors of AIFs to make mandatory sponsor commitment[1] to the AIF, it is imperative that the restrictions on residents investing in FPIs do not conflict with the mandatory sponsor commitment requirements under AIF Regulations, as applicable to AIFs in IFSC.Continue Reading SEBI amends FPI Regulations to permit registration of AIFs in IFSC with resident sponsors/ managers as FPIs
The RBI has amended the Master Directions on Financial Services provided by Banks. This is a significant move permitting Banks to invest in Category II Alternative Investment Funds.
As of June 30, 2017, Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) had raised the cumulative figure of Rs. 48, 129 crores, against aggregate capital commitments of Rs 96,000 crores. The AIF industry is thus growing at an exponential rate, raising monies from domestic and offshore investors.
Unfortunately, however, the Indian AIF industry, lags behind its western counterparts in terms of participation by domestic pools of capital. In western countries, long term or patient capital, such as pension funds, contributes nearly 40% of the capital raised by AIFs. In the Indian context, restrictions prescribed by sector regulators have inhibited fund managers from raising capital from the domestic financial services sector.
Hence, it was no surprise that one of the key themes in the 2016 reports of the Alternative Investment Policy Advisory Committee (AIPAC), chaired by Mr Narayan Murthy, was “unlocking domestic pools of capital”. The committee’s recommendation was premised on the argument that the domestic capital pools – pensions, insurance, domestic financial institutions, banks, and charitable institutions – need access to appropriate investment opportunities to earn risk-adjusted returns.Continue Reading It’s a Yes – for Banks!