The Supreme Court of India has termed the right to travel beyond the territory of India as a fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This was most famously stated in the case of Menaka Gandhi v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1978), which had confirmed its earlier judgment in Satwant Singh Sawhney v D. Ramarathnam (1967). As a signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), Indian legislation in this regard is also bound by Article 13, which guarantees people: (1) the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state; and (2) the right to leave any country, including their own, and to return to their country.
However, reasonable travel restrictions are constitutionally valid, and are enforced through the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967. Recently, Governmental agencies, police authorities and courts have begun issuing these restrictions through ‘Look out Notices’ or ‘Look out Circulars’ (LOC). These communications are being issued to restrict the departure of persons from India if they are subject to an investigation by the issuing agency for a cognisable offence, or where the accused is evading arrest or the trial, or where the person is a proclaimed offender. Until the Maneka Gandhi case there were no regulatory guidelines for enforcing any travel restrictions, or for issuing LOCs.
The Regulatory History of LOCs
Even though LOCs were first officially recognised in 1979, they have recently been used, frequently, to telling effect. In 1979, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) for the first time issued guidelines for issuing LOCs, followed by two more such communications:
- A letter dated September 5, 1979 (25022/13/78-F.I) (1979 MHA Letter);
- An office memorandum dated December 27, 2000 (25022/20/98/F.IV) (2000 Memorandum)
- An office memorandum dated October 27, 2010 (25016/31/2010-Imm) (OM)
Continue Reading Look Out Notices: A Questionable Exercise in Power?