Capital Markets

Purpose is No Defence: Supreme Court’s ruling and the Roadmap for Insider Trading Compliance

Summary: By affirming that insider-trading liability under the 2015 PIT Regulations turns on possession of information and not the purpose behind the trade, the Court has shut the door on ‘legitimate reason’ defences that SAT and earlier precedents had left ajar. Designated persons, compliance officers, listed companies and sponsors must now carefully navigate next steps to avoid breaches and regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading Purpose is No Defence: Supreme Court’s ruling and the Roadmap for Insider Trading Compliance
The Securities Market Code, 2025 (Bill No. 200 of 2025): Raising the Bar to Embrace the Future

Summary: This blog examines the Securities Market Code Bill, 2025, in terms of key changes, and their implications for SEBI and the securities market. SEBI’s regulatory role, along with increased involvement of market infrastructure institutions, securities market service providers and self-regulatory organisations, is poised for significant reform. While the shift towards a principle-based statute upholding good governance, natural justice, transparency and accountability is laudable, certain challenges relating to implementation and capacity-building should be addressed.

Continue Reading The Securities Market Code, 2025 (Bill No. 200 of 2025): Raising the Bar to Embrace the Future
SEBI’s final word on Merchant Bankers Regulations – Notification of key amendments

Summary: This blog deals with the key changes introduced in terms of the SEBI (Merchant Bankers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025, issued through a notification dated December 3, 2025. Building on SEBI’s proposals, this piece outlines how the amendments overhaul the existing SEBI (Merchant Banker) Regulations, 1992 for the first time since their introduction and highlights the major reforms that will come into effect from January 1, 2026.

Continue Reading SEBI’s final word on Merchant Bankers Regulations – Notification of key amendments

Summary: Companies undertaking a reverse flip with an eye on an India IPO may need to navigate a complex web of potentially time-sensitive legal and regulatory issues, which may impact the company’s legal, financial, and compliance frameworks and give founders, investors, and the management lots to consider. If not planned carefully, issues may become bottlenecks or roadblocks during the IPO process. Companies should anticipate Indian regulatory expectations to align moving parts well in advance for a successful and timely IPO.

Continue Reading The Road Home Leads to Dalal Street: Key considerations for IPOs after “reverse flips”
Market Rumours SEBI’s New Prescription and India Inc’s Dilemma SM

Context

With effect from October 1, 2023, India’s top 100 listed entities (based on market capitalisation) would have to mandatorily confirm, deny, or clarify market rumours to the stock exchanges, and this requirement extends to the top 250 listed entities with effect from April 1, 2024. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), by way of notifying amendments to the LODR Regulations on June 14, 2023 (“LODR Amendments”), has introduced this mandatory requirement under Regulation 30 read with Schedule III of the LODR Regulations (referred to below as the “Market Rumours Amendment”).

Continue Reading Market Rumours: SEBI’s New Prescription and India Inc’s Dilemma

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) has recently introduced significant changes to the governance framework for listed companies through an amendment to the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“LODR Regulations”).

The amendments were signaled by various consultation papers issued by SEBI over the last 6-9 months, including consultation papers on ‘Review of disclosure requirements for material events or information under SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015’ and ‘Strengthening Corporate Governance at Listed Entities by Empowering Shareholders – Amendments to the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015’.

Continue Reading SEBI Amendments to the LODR – An Overview of Key Changes
Enforceability of Put Options under SCRA – Bombay HC’s latest judgment finally clears the air!  

Historical Background

The legal position with respect to enforceability of put option clauses has not been a glorious chapter in the history of India’s securities law. The genesis of this vexed issue lies in – (i) the erstwhile Section 20 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (“SCRA”) which had provided that all options in securities shall be illegal[1]; and (ii) a notification issued by the Ministry of Finance in 1969, which inter alia provided that any contract for sale or purchase of securities, other than such spot delivery contract or contract for cash or hand delivery or special delivery in any securities shall be prohibited[2] (“1969 Notification”).

Continue Reading Enforceability of Put Options under SCRA – Bombay HC’s latest judgment finally clears the air!  

Introduction

In December 2022, SEBI’s Board approved certain amendments to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Buy-Back of Securities) Regulations, 2018 (the “Existing Regulations”). These amendments were published on February 7, 2023, pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Buy-Back of Securities) (Amendment) Regulations, 2023 (“Amendment Regulations and with the Existing Regulations the “Buyback Regulations”). The Amendment Regulations come into force from the 30th day of their publication in the official gazette, i.e. on March 9, 2023. The emphasis of several of the amendments was on simplifying the buyback process, by eliminating certain methods of buyback and reducing overall timelines.

Continue Reading Simplifications and Eliminations: A Synopsis of the Amended Buyback Regulations
Stock Exchange Process

On February 1, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) had introduced the mechanism for offer for sale through the stock exchange (the “Stock Exchange OFS”) with the intention of facilitating offloading by promoters and promoter group members in listed companies. It was expected to bring in transparency in secondary transactions as well as draw wider participation. The introduction of the Stock Exchange OFS was also a recognition of limitations of then existing methods for achieving minimum public shareholding (the “MPS”), i.e. taking the public issue route, which was both time consuming and cumbersome.

Continue Reading Offer for sale through the stock exchange process – whether recent changes will revitalise the process?

Analysis of recently attempted Voluntary Delistings

The number of voluntarily delistings seen in the last 1 (one) year has surpassed the number of delistings attempted earlier in a single year. Promoters are choosing to voluntarily delist their companies from the stock exchanges for various reasons including stock market price not being reflective of true value of the company’s stock, having full control over operations (without being required to go for any public vote for critical transactions), restructuring of their group entities, greater flexibility and reducing costs related to numerous regulatory compliances.

Even the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) introduced various amendments (mostly for tightening of procedure) under the new SEBI (Delisting of Equity Shares) Regulations, 2021 (2021 Delisting Regulations). The 2021 Delisting Regulations replaced the old SEBI (Delisting of Equity Shares) Regulations, 2009 (2009 Delisting Regulations). However, the key elements of a delisting process i.e. requirement of super majority of minority shareholder being in favour of the delisting proposal and the bidding process through the reserve book build (RBB) mechanism remain the same even under the new 2021 Delisting Regulations.
Continue Reading Analysis of recently attempted Voluntary Delistings