Summary: Every time a serious governance failure is discovered, the subject of corporate governance and the role of independent directors take centre stage and become the subject matter of intense media debate. The reality is that independent directors are non-executive directors and have a limited role to play in the day-to-day management of the company. This blog examines the need for regulators to strike a healthy balance between authority and responsibility. The author appeals to the regulators to re-examine the roles and responsibilities of independent directors and set realistic expectations.Continue Reading India Inc’s Governance Dilemma: Are Expectations from Independent Directors Unrealistic?
Changing Face of Regulators
Summary: There is an unmistakable change in India’s regulatory architecture. Traditional heavyweight institutional regulators are gradually introducing measures to move away from a rigid enforcement system to a more trust-based framework. Enforcement actions of two key regulators – the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the Reserve bank of India (RBI) appear to be softening. The finance ministry’s move towards deregulation was also evident in Budget 2025, where the formation of a committee to overhaul non-financial sector regulations was announced. The intention behind this announcement was to shed regulatory load and nurture an environment where enterprises can thrive. Simultaneously, newer watchdogs and their enforcement instincts are emerging as powerful force. They are turning out to be more assertive, which thwarts the effort to balance systemic resilience with enterprise growth.Continue Reading Changing Face of Regulators
Reimagining Board Accountability: From Rotational Retirement to RPT Disqualifications
Summary: “The blog proposes targeted amendments in relation to the following: (i) outdated mechanism of rotational retirement under Section 152(6) of the Companies Act, 2013, and (ii) issue relating to the disqualification of the director for RPTs violations, specifically in line with the legal gap created by the decriminalisation of Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013.”Continue Reading Reimagining Board Accountability: From Rotational Retirement to RPT Disqualifications
Steering the ship: Accomplishing Board autonomy post-listing
Introduction
The listing of a multinational corporation’s subsidiary (“Subsidiary(ies)”) on the Indian bourses is a major shift for the once private company. This allows the Subsidiary to unlock value through India’s thriving capital market, while also subjecting it to oversight by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”). SEBI functions as the watchdog for the Indian securities market and ensures that listed entities comply with corporate governance norms to protect the interests of minority shareholders.Continue Reading Steering the ship: Accomplishing Board autonomy post-listing
SEBI’s Take on Independent Directors: On Paper or in Fact?
Summary: In this article, we analyse recent guidance and enforcement actions by SEBI, which provide valuable insights into the approach of the regulator in interpreting the statutory framework on independent directors while applying it in practice.Continue Reading SEBI’s Take on Independent Directors: On Paper or in Fact?
Independent Directors and ‘Material’ Pecuniary Relationships: Ambiguity to Clarity
SUMMARY OF THE BLOG
This blog examines the concept of ‘material pecuniary relationship’ while assessing a director’s independence under SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI LODR Regulations”), and the Companies Act, 2013 (“Companies Act”). It highlights the regulatory differences in thresholds and look-back periods, and analyses key regulatory interpretations, committee reports, and market practices, including the recent informal guidance issued by SEBI.Continue Reading Independent Directors and ‘Material’ Pecuniary Relationships: Ambiguity to Clarity
Debt with Discipline: Key changes introduced to SEBI LODR Regulations relevant for high value debt listed entities
Introduction
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) had introduced amendments to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI LODR Regulations”), vide the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025 (“Amendment Regulations”). These provisions came into effect from April 1, 2025, for high value debt listed entities (“HVDLEs”), with listed non-convertible debt securities of outstanding value of INR 1,000 crore or above (during a financial year) as of March 31, 2025. Such entities must ensure compliance within six months from the trigger date. The determination will have to be done on March 31 in the subsequent financial years.Continue Reading Debt with Discipline: Key changes introduced to SEBI LODR Regulations relevant for high value debt listed entities
Unseen Influence of Shadow Directors: Does it compromise corporate governance?
Introduction
The Companies Act, 2013 (“CA 2013”) defines a director as a person who has been appointed to the Board of a company[1]. Directors typically have various duties and obligations towards the company, shareholders and all other stakeholders. They are also subject to civil and criminal liability under CA 2013, as well as under various other statutes, which have a standard vicarious liability clause for directors and officers of the company. In this context, another concept that emerges is of a “shadow director” or a “deemed director” who is a person not officially appointed to the Board but on whose instructions and directions the Board is accustomed to act upon. In this blog, we analyse the legal position surrounding “shadow directors” in India and the United Kingdom (“UK”).Continue Reading Unseen Influence of Shadow Directors: Does it compromise corporate governance?
“One Level Below”: Clarifying the Hierarchical Position of the Compliance Officer under SEBI LODR Regulations
Regulation 6(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI LODR Regulations”), requires every listed entity to appoint a company secretary as a compliance officer. The responsibilities of such an officer includes, among other things, ensuring compliance with regulations, coordinating with relevant authorities, verifying accuracy of submissions, and overseeing grievance redressal mechanisms. On April 1, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) released a clarification[1] on the position of the compliance officer in terms of Regulation 6 of the SEBI LODR.[2]Continue Reading “One Level Below”: Clarifying the Hierarchical Position of the Compliance Officer under SEBI LODR Regulations
The Doctrine of Vicarious Liability of Auditors: Delhi HC Judgment in Deloitte v. Union of India
Background
India’s evolving financial reporting system has made robust corporate governance mechanisms indispensable. The need for heightened financial reporting mechanisms was first felt after the country was rocked by multiple corporate scandals, specifically 2009’s Satyam Computer scam. The scam exposed numerous auditing-related issues, namely, the manipulative practices of auditors, inadequacy of regulatory oversight in accounting and auditing standards, and the importance of accountability of the professional conduct of auditors. It also raised crucial questions related to the independence and effectiveness of auditors. Against this backdrop, there was a reverberating demand for stronger institutional frameworks to regulate and supervise accounting and auditing standards in the country. It became imperative to set up an autonomous body for financial reporting to attract foreign investment and elevate public confidence in the financials of investee companies, leading to the establishment of the National Financial Reporting Authority (“NFRA”).Continue Reading The Doctrine of Vicarious Liability of Auditors: Delhi HC Judgment in Deloitte v. Union of India