Introduction

Keeping up with the advancements in the digital payments industry and the Indian government’s initiative to promote ease of doing business, the Ministry of Finance, in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”), notified the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2024 (“Compounding Rules”), on September 12, 2024, in supersession of the erstwhile Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000 (“Erstwhile Compounding Rules”). The Compounding Rules were followed by Direction on Compounding of Contravention under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (“FEMA”), which was notified by the RBI on October 01, 2024 (“Compounding Directions”).Continue Reading Foreign Exchange Compounding Proceedings: Baby Steps or Revamped?

Vote-Pooling Arrangements between Shareholders – Deeper Reflections

Cardinal Principle:

The cardinal principle of Company law, as enshrined under Section 47 of the Companies Act, 2013 ( “the Act”)provides that every equity shareholder shall have the right to vote on every resolution placed before the company and his voting right on a poll shall be in proportion to his shares in the paid-up equity share capital of the company.Continue Reading Vote-Pooling Arrangements between Shareholders – Deeper Reflections

The Reserve Bank Of India Mandates Compounding For Issuance Of Partly Paid-Up Units By AIFs Prior To March 14, 2024

The Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) vide its circular dated May 21, 2024 (“Circular”),[1] has required that issuance of partly paid-up units by Alternative Investment Funds (“AIFs”) to foreign investors prior to March 14, 2024, should be regularised through compounding under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (“FEMA”). Compounding by RBI is prescribed for the contravention of foreign exchange regulations as per Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000, and involve payment of a fees. In many instances, compounding requires payment of a monetary penalty to RBI.Continue Reading The Reserve Bank Of India Mandates Compounding For Issuance Of Partly Paid-Up Units By AIFs Prior To March 14, 2024

Context

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (“PMLA”), which came into force w.e.f. July 01, 2005, was enacted pursuant to India’s international obligations inter alia under the Vienna[1] and Palermo[2] Conventions, the Political Declaration and Global Programme of Action (1990)[3] adopted by the UN General Assembly, and to give effect to the recommendations made by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for combating money laundering (popularly known as the “Forty Recommendations”)[4].Continue Reading Spotlight: Why PMLA Scheduled Offences need a fresh look?

WOS Exemption

Context:

Ever since the stock market scam of 2001 (Ketan Parekh Scam) was brought to light, regulators have been vigilant about the use of complex corporate structures to circumvent statutory restrictions and divert company funds. After the magnitude of financial irregularities in the Ketan Parekh Scam came to light, the Joint Parliamentary Committee (“JPC”) and the erstwhile Department of Company Affairs (“DCA”) proposed steps to prevent  companies from using the ‘subsidiary route’ to siphon off funds, by providing inter-corporate loans.[1]Continue Reading The Layering Restrictions & WOS exemption – Need for Regulatory clarity

LSF – The Journey

The uniform ‘late submission fee’ (“LSF”) is a relatively new concept in the Indian exchange control regime. The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (“FEMA”), as originally introduced by the legislature, did not envisage the concept of LSF. Resolving a delay in reporting of equity or debt transactions under FEMA would necessarily require compounding of offences before the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”). Given that compounding is not the most time efficient or simple process, it implied that even for insignificant or genuine delays, parties would have to undergo several steps, thus making the system clogged with late filings and filings becoming more cumbersome than they needed to be.Continue Reading Uniformisation of Late Submission Fee under FEMA: A One Stop Shop?

GIFT City

Introduction

The onset of Global In-house Centres (“GICs”) in India was driven by global financial services companies seeking to drive costs down and access India’s large talent pool across various locations. These factors together made it a compelling case for GICs to invest in India to setup large centres which performed a variety of functions across technology, risk, AML, operations, research, credit analysis, etc., for a wide variety of businesses, from retail banking, wholesale banking to investment banking, located in various foreign countries. This model has been visibly successful in driving the upskilling of a large talent pool in India and enabling significant cost advantages to the financial services companies that have implemented this model.Continue Reading GICs in IFSC, GIFT City: A Combination to Unlock Value

Arbitral Award

I. Introduction

One of the quintessential features of an arbitration friendly jurisdiction is a robust award enforcement mechanism. Often such enforcement mechanisms are determined by the interpretation of ‘public policy’ of each jurisdiction. In India, the trajectory of public policy has witnessed dramatic advancements, resulting in a much narrower scope and ambit of interpretation. Consequently, Indian courts have adopted a pro-enforcement stance and this pattern can be observed even in the arbitral awards that have been passed in disputes relating to exchange control laws and securities regulations.Continue Reading Enforcement of a Foreign Arbitral Award: Calcutta High Court Contextualises Fundamental Policy of Indian Law

Overseas Direct Investment

Background

Outbound investments in India have witnessed a significant decline from its peak in the golden period of 2005-08. As per the data collated by the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”), in July 2011, the total outbound financial commitment was at USD 5,478.15 million. This figure has declined over the decade to USD 2,047.79 million in December 2021.Continue Reading RBI’s proposed regulatory architecture for the ODI Regime – Does it meet India Inc’s expectations?