Summary: The Board’s discretion to dispose of unsubscribed portion of rights issue to non-shareholders was made a bit easier by the Companies Act, 2013, by giving more flexibility to the Board as compared to the language used in the 1956 Act. However, whether such disposal is tantamount to a preferential allotment or a public offer
Summary: The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has mandated that all private companies (other than small companies) must dematerialise their securities effective July 1, 2025. While the reform is a progressive step towards enhancing transparency, efficiency and investor protection, its implementation has highlighted several procedural and regulatory challenges. Addressing these gaps through regulatory clarity, harmonisation of processes, and simplified documentation, specifically for cross-border investors, will be essential for making the dematerialisation regime more practical and business-friendly, rather than a mere compliance requirement. Continue Reading Paper To Electronic: The Demat Transition For Private Companies
Summary: The trend of Indian businesses relocating offshore is reversing, with many now seeking to “reverse flip” to India, driven by the nation’s vibrant economy and capital markets. While the reverse flip offers significant opportunities, it requires careful navigation of legal processes, along with addressing complex regulatory, and corporate compliance aspects. Understanding these key considerations is crucial for companies contemplating a return to India.Continue Reading Aa Ab Laut Chalein!: Key Considerations for ‘Reverse Flips’
Summary: The winding racetrack of geopolitics and the global economic realignment currently underway is a once in a lifetime opportunity for India to claim its rightful place in the new economic order – this race is on and the agility of doing M&A will play a key role in driving outcomes for India’s development. The 2025 fast-track merger amendments promise to turbo-charge M&A for mid-market companies, are incremental reforms enough, or is it time for an overhaul?Continue Reading The Need for Speed – Fast Track Mergers
Summary: The MCA has unleashed a significant liberalisation of the fast-track merger framework, introducing four revolutionary changes by allowing unlisted companies, non-wholly owned subsidiaries and fellow subsidiary transactions to access the fast-track route, while also streamlining cross-border mergers. This change makes the fast-track route viable for a broader range of entities and seeks to reduce the NCLT’s burden, potentially allowing it to focus on contentious matters requiring judicial oversight.Continue Reading The Four Pillars of Change: Unpacking India’s New Fast-Track Merger Regime
Summary: This blog examines the concept of “deemed public company” and recommends changes in the legal architecture to deal with large private companies with significant exposure to public funds.Continue Reading Reimagining the Regulatory Architecture for Deemed Public Companies
Summary: There is an unmistakable change in India’s regulatory architecture. Traditional heavyweight institutional regulators are gradually introducing measures to move away from a rigid enforcement system to a more trust-based framework. Enforcement actions of two key regulators – the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the Reserve bank of India (RBI) appear to be softening. The finance ministry’s move towards deregulation was also evident in Budget 2025, where the formation of a committee to overhaul non-financial sector regulations was announced. The intention behind this announcement was to shed regulatory load and nurture an environment where enterprises can thrive. Simultaneously, newer watchdogs and their enforcement instincts are emerging as powerful force. They are turning out to be more assertive, which thwarts the effort to balance systemic resilience with enterprise growth.Continue Reading Changing Face of Regulators
This blog examines the concept of ‘material pecuniary relationship’ while assessing a director’s independence under SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI LODR Regulations”), and the Companies Act, 2013 (“Companies Act”). It highlights the regulatory differences in thresholds and look-back periods, and analyses key regulatory interpretations, committee reports, and market practices, including the recent informal guidance issued by SEBI.Continue Reading Independent Directors and ‘Material’ Pecuniary Relationships: Ambiguity to Clarity
In a recent case, the National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”) rejected a scheme of merger of three related entities on the ground that it was against public interest. Unlike the other cases of arrangements and schemes where the NCLT focused on the technical compliance of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”), in the instant case, the NCLT, in addition to analysing the scheme and verifying its satisfaction of the technical requirements, also went through the facts presented and the reports submitted by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”) and the Income Tax Department (“ITD”), who had carried out their separate investigations. The trend of recent decisions appears to show that the NCLT is not just mechanically sanctioning schemes of merger but is also going beyond the facts provided and reviewing them holistically.Continue Reading NCLT rejects a scheme of merger citing public interest concerns
The genesis of the concept of ‘significant beneficial ownership’ under Indian law can be traced to the Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”) recommendations on issues pertaining to ‘transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons and arrangements’. Set up in 1989, the FATF is a global inter-governmental body, now serving as a watchdog for global money laundering and terrorist financing. Continue Reading Ultimate parent’s professional CEO a Significant Beneficial Owner: Do companies have to re-evaluate their corporate approval process and reporting line structures?