POSH Act

Subscribe to POSH Act via RSS
Karnataka High Court rules cab-aggregator drivers are employees under POSH Act: Broader implications for gig workers in India

In a significant legal development,the Karnataka High Court (“HC”) inMs. X v. ANI Technologies Private Limited (“Respondent“) and Others[1] inter alia held that the driver-subscribers of the Respondent were its ‘employees’ for the purposes of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (“POSH Act”), and hence, the Respondent was in violation of the POSH Act for not taking any action against a driver-subscriber despite several attempts of the aggrieved customer to seek redressal (“Petitioner”). The writ petition was filed by the Petitioner, pursuant to inaction on the part of the Respondent and the internal committee (“IC”) constituted by it under the POSH Act, to consider the Petitioner’s request to inquire into her complaint of sexual harassment on the grounds that the IC lacked jurisdiction to do so as the said accused driver was not an ‘employee’ of the Respondent, but an independent contractor.Continue Reading Karnataka High Court rules cab-aggregator drivers are employees under POSH Act: Broader implications for gig workers in India

Background

The Parliament took 16 years to implement the directions issued by the Supreme Court of India in 1997, in the landmark case of Visakha vs. State of Rajasthan[1] (“Visakha Guidelines”) to enact a law for the prevention of sexual harassment of women at the workplace. The enactment of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (“Act”) and the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Rules, 2013 (“Rules”) was very late, but better so than never.Continue Reading POSH Act – Implementational Challenges

Sec 377 LGBT Employment in India

The Supreme Court of India has held Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) to be unconstitutional, in so far as it penalises any consensual sexual relationship between two adults, be it homosexuals, heterosexuals or lesbians (Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India and Ors. (2018) (Johar Judgment). By way of this landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has overruled its earlier decision in Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation (2013), whereby, the validity of Section 377 of the IPC had been upheld.
Continue Reading What Does the Section 377 Judgment Mean for a Modern Day Employer?