Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited’s (Crompton) appeal has been dismissed, upholding the order that restrains Crompton from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in electric irons under the impugned “PEBBLE” trademark, due to V Guard Industries Limited’s (V Guard) application.
Continue Reading Whether “CROMPTON PEBBLE” and “PEBBLE” are similar or identical?
In the vibrant world of cricket, a sport intricately linked to the country’s cultural tapestry, fan banter — whether between individuals or Corporates — is not merely accepted; it is cherished. Yet, there lies a fine line between good-natured ribbing and the realms of trademark infringement or disparagement. When does humorous exchange tip over into the perilous territory of legal breach? This very question was at the heart of a recent Delhi High Court case, Royal Challengers Sports Private Limited v. Uber India Systems Private Limited & Ors., which saw the popular IPL franchise Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) clashing off-field with ride-hailing giant Uber India.[1]
Continue Reading Royally Challenged or Legally Sound? Examining Trademark Law through RCB v. Uber India
The International Financial Services Centres Authority (Capital Market Intermediaries) Regulations, 2025 (“New CMI Regulations”), were notified by the International Financial Services Centres (“IFSCA”) on April 11, 2025, in supersession of the erstwhile International Financial Services Centres Authority (Capital Market Intermediaries) Regulations, 2021 (“Old CMI Regulations”), and the IFSCA Circular No. F. No. 817/IFSCA/Distribution/2022-23 titled “Distribution of Capital Market Products and Services under the IFSCA (Capital Market Intermediaries) Regulations, 2021” (“Old Distribution Circular”), dated December 21, 2022.
Continue Reading AIF Distributors and the IFSC Opportunity: What’s Changing in 2025
The Companies Act, 2013 (“CA 2013”) defines a director as a person who has been appointed to the Board of a company[1]. Directors typically have various duties and obligations towards the company, shareholders and all other stakeholders. They are also subject to civil and criminal liability under CA 2013, as well as under various other statutes, which have a standard vicarious liability clause for directors and officers of the company. In this context, another concept that emerges is of a “shadow director” or a “deemed director” who is a person not officially appointed to the Board but on whose instructions and directions the Board is accustomed to act upon. In this blog, we analyse the legal position surrounding “shadow directors” in India and the United Kingdom (“UK”).
Continue Reading Unseen Influence of Shadow Directors: Does it compromise corporate governance?
Stablecoins, which are virtual digital assets (“VDA”) typically pegged to stable assets like fiat currencies, are being recognised as the cornerstone of digital finance revolution, delivering a blend of traditional currency stability and decentralised innovation. As their global adoption accelerates — from everyday retail transactions/ cross-border remittances to institutional treasury operations — governments worldwide are realising that clear, forward-thinking regulation can foster innovation and help their economies stay ahead of the pack.
Continue Reading FIG Paper (No. 43 – VDA Series 5) India’s Stablecoin Industry – Reacting to Global Regulations & Market Trends
In the Indian culinary landscape, for a substantial segment of the population, particularly those adhering to vegetarian diets, paneer serves not merely as a delicacy but as a vital source of protein and essential nutrients, effectively stepping in where non-vegetarian options might otherwise feature. From rich curries to flavourful stir-fries, delectable snacks and desserts, Indians consume paneer in different forms. However, recent concerns regarding proliferation of ‘fake’ paneer in the market have created doubts and apprehensions in the minds of Indian consumers.
Continue Reading Paneer or Not Really Paneer? Navigating the Regulatory Landscape of Dairy Analogues in India
Regulation 6(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI LODR Regulations”), requires every listed entity to appoint a company secretary as a compliance officer. The responsibilities of such an officer includes, among other things, ensuring compliance with regulations, coordinating with relevant authorities, verifying accuracy of submissions, and overseeing grievance redressal mechanisms. On April 1, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) released a clarification[1] on the position of the compliance officer in terms of Regulation 6 of the SEBI LODR.[2]
Continue Reading “One Level Below”: Clarifying the Hierarchical Position of the Compliance Officer under SEBI LODR Regulations
The Delhi High Court, on February 24, 2025, passed an order in Arcturus Therapeutics v. Controller of Patents[1], remanding the case back to the patent office for reconsideration by the Assistant Controller of Patents on merit.
Continue Reading Reject patent application on merit, not for failing to follow procedure: Delhi High Court
The advent of large language models (“LLMs”) such as OpenAI’s GPT and Google’s Gemini has revolutionised how content is created, consumed, and commercialised. These generative AI systems, trained on massive volumes of publicly available data, can now generate human-like expressions at unprecedented pace and scale. While such technological advances are to be welcomed for their potential to enhance human capacity and to contribute to the progress of knowledge, they also raise fundamental yet profound questions about the extent to which the law is equipped to regulate such an foreseeable development.
Continue Reading ‘Fair Use’ in the Age of AI
On March 17, 2025, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) notified a pivotal amendment to India’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006. This amendment reversed a four-year-long exemption granted to certain excavation activities carried out for linear infrastructure projects, such as roads, pipelines, and transmission lines. The change introduces a new Appendix XIV to the EIA Notification, formally defining “linear projects” and setting out standard operating procedures (SOPs) and safeguards that must be followed when sourcing or borrowing “ordinary earth” for such works. The revised position replaces the controversial Item 6 of Appendix IX, which was introduced via the 2020 amendment and was later struck down by the Supreme Court of India.
Continue Reading Linear Projects No Longer Exempted Under EIA Notification