Disputes

Decoding Delhi High Court’s Ruling: The inter-relationship of injunctive relief and patent validity challenges

The Delhi High Court decided an important case on patent law in Novo Nordisk A/S v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. The dispute involved Semaglutide, a widely used drug for diabetes and obesity. It addressed an important issue: can a patentee/ Plaintiff obtain an injunction if the Defendant, with knowledge of the Plaintiff’s patent rights, proceeds with production/ manufacturing of the patented drug,without first initiating revocation or non-infringement proceedings. Notably, the Delhi High Court declined to release the Defendant from its undertaking of not selling the patented drug in India as it had begun manufacturing/ production without “clearing the way”, despite being fully aware of the suit patent. The Court, however, allowed the Defendant to export to jurisdictions where the Plaintiff holds no patent rights. The judgment serves as an important precedent in determining the inter-relationship between injunctive relief and patent validity challenges.Continue Reading Decoding Delhi High Court’s Ruling: The inter-relationship of injunctive relief and patent validity challenges

Unregistered Leases: Rights, Risks, and Remedies

Summary: Registering lease deeds removes ambiguity, provides legal certainty, and prevents disputes over implied renewal.  This protects both landlords and tenants, reduces litigation and promotes smoother tenancy transitions.  This blog explains the legal significance of registration of leases and guides readers on the risks of leaving leases unregistered, empowering them to make informed decisions and avoid unnecessary disputes. Continue Reading Unregistered Leases: Rights, Risks, and Remedies

The immunity granted under Section 79(1) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (“the Act”) to intermediaries, commonly referred to a ‘safe harbour provision’, is not absolute.  Non-compliance with an order under Section 69A is one such instance when the immunity erodes[1].

Section 69A empowers the government to issue directions to government agencies or intermediaries to block public access to any information generated, transmitted, received, stored or hosted in any computer resource, if it falls under any of the grounds of concern mentioned in Section 69A itself (discussed below in detail).Continue Reading The Twitter Verdict: Examining The Efficacy Of Section 69a In The Background Of Karnataka High Court’s Latest Decision